• Chang-Deng, et al. (2007). Visualization of Protein Interactions in Living Cells Using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) Analysis. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. Unit 21.3.
  • Biskup, et al. (2007) Multi-dimensional fluorescence lifetime and FRET measurements. Microscopy Research and Technique.
  • Massoud, et al. (2007) Reporter gene imaging of protein–protein interactions in living subjects . Curr. Op. Biotech. 18, 31-37.
  • Cardullo, R. (2007) Theoretical Principles and Practical Considerations for Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy. Methods in Cell Biology. 81, 479-494.
  • Piston and Kremer (2007) Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 32, 407-414.
  • Domingo, et al. (2007) Imaging FRET standards by steady-state fluorescence and lifetime methods. Microscopy Research and Technique. 70, 1010-1021.
  • Ohad, et al. (2007). The Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions in Plants by Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation. Plant Physiology. 145, 1090-1099.
  • Goedhart, et al. (2007). Sensitive Detection of p65 Homodimers Using Red-Shifted and Fluorescent Protein-Based FRET Couples. PloS One. 10, e1011.
  • J. G. McNally. (2008). Quantitative FRAP in Analysis of Molecular Binding Dynamics In Vivo. Methods in Cell Biology. 85, 329-351.
  • Shimizono and Miyawaki. (2008). Engineering FRET Constructs Using CFP and YFP. Methods in Cell Biology. 85, 381-393.
  • T. K. Kerppola. (2008). Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation: Visualization of Molecular Interactions in Living Cells. Methods in Cell Biology. 85, 431-470.
  • Day, et al. (2008). Characterization of an improved donor fluorescent protein for Förster resonance energy transfer microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 031203.
  • VanEngelenburg and Palmer (2008). Fluorescent biosensors of protein function. Curr. Op. Chem. Biol. 12, 60-65.
  • Van der Krogt, et al. (2008). A Comparison of Donor-Acceptor Pairs for Genetically Encoded FRET Sensors: Application to the Epac cAMP Sensor as an Example. PloS ONE. 3, e1916.
  • Li, et al. (2008). Molecular beacons: An optimal multifunctional biological probe. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 373, 457-461.
  • Mueller, et al. (2008). Evidence for a Common Mode of Transcription Factor Interaction with Chromatin as Revealed by Improved Quantitative Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching. Biophysical Journal. 94, 3323-3339.
  • Ai, et al. (2008). Fluorescent protein FRET pairs for ratiometric imaging of dual biosensors. Nature Methods. 5, 401-403.
  • Periasamy, et al. (2008). Chapter 22 Quantitation of Protein–Protein Interactions: Confocal FRET Microscopy. Methods in Cell Biology. 89, 569-598.
  • Antoine Triller and Daniel Choquet . (2008). New Concepts in Synaptic Biology Derived from Single-Molecule Imaging. Neuron. 59, 359-374
  • Weinthal and Tzfira. (2009). Imaging protein–protein interactions in plant cells by bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay. Trends in Plant Science. 14, 59-63.
  • Shcherbo, et al. (2009). Practical and reliable FRET/FLIM pair of fluorescent proteins. BMC Biotechnol. 9: 24.
  • Kang, et al. (2009). A Generalization of Theory for Two-Dimensional Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching Applicable to Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopes. Biophysical Journal. 97, 1501-1511.
  • Padilla-Parra, et al. (2009). In The Quest Of The Best Fluorescent Protein Couple For Quantitative FRET-FLIM. Biophysical Journal. 96, 403a.
  • Padilla-Parra, et al. (2009). Quantitative Comparison of Different Fluorescent Protein Couples for Fast FRET-FLIM Acquisition. Biophysical Journal. 97. 2368-2376.
  • Brzostowski, et al. (2009). Imaging Protein-Protein Interactions by Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Microscopy in Live Cells. Current Protocols in Protein Science. UNIT 19.5
  • Nakamura and Matsuda. (2009). In Vivo Imaging of Signal Transduction Cascades with Probes Based on Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). Current Protocols in Cell Biol. Unit 14.10.
  • Trembecka, et al. (2010). Conditions for using FRAP as a quantitative technique - Influence of the bleaching protocol. Cytometry. Part A. 77A, 366 - 370.
  • Mueller, et al. (2010). FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know?. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 22, 403-411.
  • C. Depry and J. Zhang (2010). Visualization of Kinase Activity with FRET-Based Activity Biosensors. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology UNIT 18.15.
  • Yuansheng, et al. (2010). FRET microscopy in 2010: The legacy of Theodor Förster in the 100th Anninversary of his birth. ChemPhysChem. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000664.
  • Hernán, et al. (2010). FRET in Cell Biology: Still shining in the age of super-resolution? ChemPhysChem. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000795.
  • Pietraszewska-Bogiel and Gadella. (2010). FRET microscopy: from principle to routine technology in cell biology. J. Microscopy. 241, 111-118.
  • Ishikawa-Ankerhold. (2012). Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques-FRAP, FLIP, FLAP, FRET and FLIM. Molecules. 17, 4047-4132.
  • Mueller, et al. (2012). Minimizing the impact of photoswitching of fluorescent proteins on FRAP analysis. Biophys. J. 102, 1656-1665.
  • Seits, et al. (2012). Quatifying the influence of yellow fluorescent photoconversion on acceptor photobleaching-based fluorescence energy transfer measurements. Biomd. Opt. 17, 011010.
  • W. Becker. (2012). Fluorescence lifetime imaging- techniques and applications. J. Microscopy. 247, 119-136.
  • Kodama and Hu. (2012). Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): A 5-year update and future prespectives. Biotechniques. 53, 285-298.
  • Broussard, et al. (2013). Fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy as demonstrated by measuring the activation of the serine/threonine kinase Akt. Nature Protocols. 8, 265-281.
  • Grecco and Bastiaens. (2013). Quantifying cellular dynamics by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy. Curr. Protocol. Neurosci. 5.22.1-5.22.14.
  • Kemp-O´Brien and Parsons. (2013), Using FRET to analyse signals controlling cell adhesion and migration. Journal of Microscopy, 251: 270–278.